THE LIQUIDATION OF JAMES BULMER

Posted to Old LaF on 13 January 2011

James BULMER’s life was complicated enough to cause some confusion in the minds of 21st century seekers of genealogical truth. So far, I have only put his birth family on the Filey Community Tree. Kath, in her Filey Folk database, has James marrying twice, first to “Mary Ann Bulmer” and then Ann TEMPLE. Ann, the daughter of George TEMPLE and Mary, had a son in 1873 who was given the name Pickering TEMPLE. Kath has Ann marrying John PICKERING in Darlington that year.

Bulmer Families Genealogy records only one marriage for James but two family groups for Ann, the first headed by an unnamed male who appears to have given her four children, none of them called “Pickering”. When James and Ann did marry their offspring went into the melting pot of half-siblings at subsequent Bulmer census households.

Bulmer Families gives James’ occupation as “Farmer & Carter at Brickworks”. The Filey censuses show him “at home” in 1851, aged 17, out of town in 1861, a Farmer in 1881 and 1891, and a Carter in 1901. He had a ‘tween census adventure as an Innkeeper.

On Saturday, 22nd September 1878 the Scarborough Mercury reported –

ANOTHER LANDLORD IN TROUBLE

James Bulmer, landlord of the Star Inn, was also summoned for permitting drunkenness in his house on the 4th inst. Sergeant Winpenny proved the case, but as there appeared to be a doubt on the minds of the bench they dismissed it.

More serious trouble found James a year or so later. The following notice appeared in the local paper on Saturday 10th January 1880 –

MESSRS. HUME AND FOWLER, AUCTIONEERS AND VALUERS,

HOUSE AND ESTATE AGENTS, UPHOLSTERS AND FURNISHING UNDERTAKERS,

102, WESTBOROUGH, SCARBOROUGH.

In the Liquidation of JAMES BULMER.

THE “STAR INN,” FILEY.

MESSRS HUME & FOWLER have received instructions from Mr ROBERT MITCHELL, Public Accountant, 2, St. Nicholas Street, Scarborough, (the Trustee in the above Estate), to SELL by AUCTION, on TUESDAY, January 13th, 1880, the following HORSES, FARM PRODUCE, IMPLEMENTS, HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, &c., viz.:-

Four Horses, aged.

About 4 Tons of Good Hay.

Do. 5 Tons of Barley Straw.

Do. 5 Tons of Oat Straw.

Do. 4 Tons Rakings.

Lorrie in excellent condition, to carry 2 tons; 2 carts, trappings for 3 horses, plough, 2 pairs harrows, stone roller, turnip-cutter, weighing machine, corn mill, 3 wheelbarrows, 5 forks, 2 rakes, 18 shelter boards, winnowing machine, stone trough, shovels, corn bin, scuttle, grindstone, &c.

About 5 Tons of Swede Turnips.

D. 30 Tons Flint Stones and Gravel.

The Straw and Stones will be sold in a Field near the Railway Station.

THE CONTENTS OF THE “STAR INN” consist of dining table, 8 small chairs, arm-chair, mantel glass, small table, fender, fire-irons, tapestry carpet, hearth rug, muslin shades, &c. Tap-room.-Eight small chairs, two armchairs, long-seat, with back; large round table, eight days’ clock, chimney glass, pictures, fender, fire-irons, &c. Also, Contents of 4 Bedrooms, Kitchen and Scullery Utensils, &c.

Sale to commence at Eleven o’clock a.m. prompt.

James didn’t know it then, but he still had 30 years of life ahead of him. At the 1881 census, there were ten mouths to feed, including seven children he claimed as his own, aged 19 down to 2, plus 8-year-old boarder, Pickering TEMPLE. (James had married Ann TEMPLE in 1875.) Sensibly, he seems to have gone back to doing what he knew best, farming and transporting people and their products around the district, though he still got into scrapes.

Scarborough Mercury, Saturday 9th April 1881

DOG LICENSE

At the Bridlington Petty Sessions on Saturday, James Bulmer, carriage driver, Filey, was summoned for keeping a dog without having a license. Sergt. Cooper stated that on March 14th, from a complaint that he had received, he went to defendant’s house and asked him if he had a dog, to which he replied “Yes.” Witness said it had been worrying some sheep or lambs. He said “Yes, it worried a lamb at Muston to-day.” Witness said, “I wonder you keep it, you know it got Cogill into trouble the other day.” Witness was directed to an outhouse, and there saw the dog. He then asked the defendant if he had got the license for it, and he replied in the negative, as he had not paid Cogill for it yet, and did not know whether it was his or not. Witness told him that he was responsible for it and for what it had done. He replied that he knew that. Defendant stated that he only had the dog on trial for a week or two, and the first day he had it out it worried a lamb so he sent it back.—The Chairman said there was a doubt in the case, and gave the defendant the benefit of it, and dismissed the case.

Four years later James put in the lowest tender for scavenging, which the Local Board accepted. (James wanted £43, Mr APPLEBY £65 and Mr G. GEDGE £50.)

Two years before his death in 1911 a James BULMER was in the dock with George BULMER, Thomas SMITH, and two or more characters called STONEHOUSE. Liquidated James was 74 years old so the BULMER facing the disapproval of the Lord of the Manor could have been his sons, James (born 1864) and George (born 1879). In the 1901 Census, the brothers were both living with their parents at 81 Queen Street, James described as a general labourer and George a carriage proprietor.

Scarborough Mercury, Friday 14 May 1909

FILEY FORESHORE RIGHTS, CHANCERY DIVISION PROCEEDINGS

In the Chancery Division on Friday, Mr Justice Neville had before him a motion in the action Mitford v. Bulmer and others, which related to foreshore rights in the neighbourhood of Filey. The plaintiff moved for an interim injunction to restrain the defendants from carting or carrying away stone, sand, gravel, seaweed, etc… from the foreshore.

Mr Maugham, who appeared for the plaintiff, said that as regarded three defendants, he asked for no order, except that the costs of the motion should be costs in the action. They were James Bulmer, George Bulmer, and Thomas Smith. Their case was that there was a narrow strip of land that did not form part of the foreshore, and it was from this that they had been taking the sand, etc. As regarded the defendants Stonehouse, however, he should submit there was a clear case, and he asked for an interlocutory injunction.

His Lordship granted an injunction against the last-named defendants until the trial or further order.

I don’t know how this case concluded but my money would be on his Lordship winning it. James BULMER Senior died on February 16th, 1911 and was buried in St Oswald’s churchyard. He shares a grave with his father.

Anniversaries

1830 · Francis CRIMLIS(K) · 786 Crimlisk G642

There is a photograph of Francis and a family tree here.

1768 · Dorothy GRINDALE

Baptised in Folkton, five miles from Filey, she is “Dolly” and only has her father for company on the Shared Tree.

Thirty years earlier, John GRINDALL, son of William, was baptised at Filey St Oswald’s. On Filey Genealogy & Connections as John Grindale, this man married Elizabeth REYNOLD in Folkton. Whether or not this makes a family unit, the trail has gone cold from here. I wonder what happened to them.

1856 · Thomas Jennings KNAPTON & Editha Sarah Ann FOSTER · 985 Harland C37

It appears that Editha was named after her maternal grandmother, but FamilySearch prefers both women to be “Edith”.

1839 · Frederick LORRIMAN · 480 Lorriman G372

1942 · John Webster BULMER · 1849 Bulmer E60

John Webster is not related by blood to “complicated” James.

Townscape 75 · Seafront

Horse Trading

Graves BULMER, Neighbour 2 a few days ago, led a seemingly quiet existence. His son was rather more lively and I wrote about some of his adventures in Looking at Filey – The Liquidation of James Bulmer.

Today, while trying to sort out the paternity of James’ children for FamilySearch Tree, I happened upon an instance of misbehaviour by one of his sons.

“A Bill to the Whole World”

Singular Horse Dealing at Scarborough

Pony “Warranted Quiet When Sound.”

A singular state of affairs was revealed at Scarborough Court on Monday, when James Bulmer, jun. (35), horse dealer, Filey, was charged with obtaining a pony by false pretences. Mr Nicholl (Deputy Town Clerk) in the course of the proceedings mentioned three instances in which the prisoner had given bills payable to the York City and County Bank in payment of horses, where he had an account. In the case in question the prisoner bought a pony for £7 from Mr. Crawshaw, of Scarborough, in payment for which prisoner handed him a bill, which was stamped, and on it prisoner had written: “Pay to my order the sum of £7 for value received to Mr. Newman Crawshaw, Langdale Road, Scarborough, (Signed) James Bulmer, 36 Queen Street, Filey.”

The Chairman: Is it a promissory note?

Town Clerk: No. It is a bill addressed to the whole world. (Laughter.)

Mr. Crawshaw said he would not have parted with the pony if he had not thought the bill would entitle him to £7 when presented at the bank, which marked the bill as worthless. He gave the prisoner a recept and a warranty. The latter was as follows:- “Warranted quiet to drive and ride when sound.” (Laughter.)

Prisoner was remanded on bail.

Bradford Daily Telegraph 31 January 1899

James senior was almost certainly young James’ father but the lad’s mother was probably Ann TEMPLE and not, as Filey Genealogy & Connections has it, “Mary Ann BULMER”. James junior was born in 1864, eleven years before his father married “Miss Temple” but the most convincing birth registration I have for him is in June Quarter 1864 in Bridlington. His name is given as “James Bulmer TEMPLE”. The mother’s maiden surname is absent, suggesting an illegitimate birth. Ann was 23 years old and at the 1861 census was living with James senior at Moor Farm, Reighton, as his housekeeper.

Ann is on FamilySearch Tree in several guises, waiting to be hitched. Here is one. Poor Newman Crawshaw isn’t on the World Tree yet but his household in 1901 is easily found in Sources.

1901_CRAWSHAWnewman